Skip to content

Heat Exchanger Problems – Part 2

High Flux Vaporisers

Heat Exchangers for Total Vaporisation

In order to minimise their volume, some fluids (e.g. ammonia, LPG, LNG) are stored as liquids at low temperature. When removing these fluids from storage it is often required to convert them into a gaseous state. This requires the use of a heat exchanger in order to supply the necessary latent heat of vaporisation.

For a number of reasons the design of such heat exchangers is problematic. There are a range of issues which, if not correctly addressed, will cause the heat exchanger to perform below expectations. These issues can be explored with reference to a typical example, in this case an ethane vaporiser.

The process conditions specified in the diagram give rise to three characteristics which are typical of this type of duty and which need to be carefully considered in the design of the heat exchanger:

1.   The first problem on the list is that freezing of the steam condensate may occur, leading to localised blockage and potential for mechanical damage. This is most likely to occur if the steam flows in a narrow channel such as the inside of a heat exchanger tube. For this reason, the designer usually elects to place the steam on the outside of the tube bundle, so that hot steam is able to flow to all areas of the surface and prevent freezing.

Other solutions to the freezing problem are:

2. The second listed problem is the large temperature driving force, which has the potential to cause film boiling. With low temperature driving force the boiling process will be nucleation, where bubbles are formed on the heat transfer surface. In nucleate boiling the heat transfer surface is wetted by the process liquid and heat transfer coefficients are high.

However, at high temperature driving force the vapour generation process is so vigorous that the liquid has difficulty wetting the heat transfer surface. A film of vapour forms on the surface and the heat transfer coefficient falls considerably.

Film boiling is not necessarily a problem in this application, provided the designer has taken account of the corresponding low heat transfer coefficient. If not, and a nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficient is assumed in the design, the heat exchanger is likely to perform at a fraction of its intended duty.

3. The third problem is that converting a liquid into a dry, superheated vapour is difficult, even if film boiling is avoided. As the boiling process progresses there is a reducing amount of ethane in the liquid phase and an increasing amount present as vapour.

This means that the film of liquid on the heat transfer surface gets progressively thinner, while the velocity of the vapour flowing over the film get progressively higher. Before the liquid can be completely vaporised, the high velocity vapour shears it off the surface and entrains it. This results in “mist” flow, with very small droplets of liquid being carried along in the vapour phase.

The problem with mist flow is that it is very difficult to convert the remaining liquid droplets into vapour. There are two reasons for this.

The practical outcome of mist flow is that the stream leaving the vaporiser may be a mixture of superheated vapour and unvaporised liquid. This liquid will be carried out of the vaporiser into downstream equipment, where it may cause damage (in a compressor for example). In order to achieve a dry vapour, the throughput of the process will often need to be severely restricted.

The problems described above lead to a number of approaches to the design of vaporisers. Three typical heat exchanger types are illustrated, each of which attempts to solve some or all of the issues identified above.

The first type illustrated is the bayonet tube heat exchanger.

bayonet tube heat exchanger

Fig 1. Bayonet tube heat exchanger


The steam enters along the inner tube and then flows into the outer tube where it condenses, supplying heat for the vaporisation of the ethane in the shell. This means that hot steam is present along the whole length of the tube, preventing freezing of the condensate. This type of unit does not, however, solve the problem of large temperature driving force, so that film boiling is still possible. Also, the arrangement of the shellside is such that superheating of the vapour is difficult to achieve and liquid carryover is probable. Separate equipment is typically required to superheat the vapour and separate any remaining liquid.

Another possible approach to the design is to use an intermediate fluid to reduce the temperature driving force in the boiling process. Two heat exchanger bundles are used: one in which the steam vaporises the intermediate fluid; another which condenses the intermediate fluid and boils the ethane.

Double bundle exchanger

Fig 2. Double Bundle exchanger


By careful selection of the intermediate fluid and its pressure, it is possible to avoid condensate freezing and reduce the temperature driving force acting on the ethane boiling process. However, the reduction in temperature driving force may not be sufficient to completely eliminate film boiling, and the problem of mist flow remains. The equipment is also relatively large and complex, leading to higher cost.

The third possibility is to use a conventional shell and tube heat exchanger with the steam on the shellside (to prevent condensate freezing). If the sizing of the heat exchanger is based on a reduced heat transfer coefficient to take account of film boiling, the only remaining issue is that of mist flow. This is solved by placing inserts into the tubes; inserts modify the flow pattern such that the entrained droplets are effectively vaporised before the ethane leaves the heat exchanger.

Two inserts types have been proved effective in this role: twisted tapes and wire-matrix inserts (e.g. hiTRAN Thermal Systems). The former works by imparting a spin to the flow which forces the droplets to impact on the heat transfer surface. The latter intercepts the droplets on the wire matrix, creating a relative velocity between droplet and vapour which rapidly vaporises the liquid.

The advantage of the tube insert solution is that all the issues affecting vaporisers are effectively addressed within a compact and simple heat exchanger. Tube inserts have been applied to the problem of total vaporisation in many applications, especially where liquid carryover has led to throughput restrictions. In many cases the inserts have been retrofitted to increase the duty of a poorly-performing vaporiser.

vapouriser duty diagram